Re: Differences in finalization of controlled objects between gcc 4.6 and gcc 4.7

["Randy Brukardt" <randy@rrsoftware.com>]

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1135 bytes --]

"Markus Sch�pflin" <no.spam@spam.spam> wrote in message 
news:ju93rg$43j$1@speranza.aioe.org...
> Am 19.07.2012 15:45, schrieb Georg Bauhaus:
>> On 19.07.12 14:23, Markus Sch�pflin wrote:
>>> Is there a way to have the objects created in place directly in the 
>>> array?
>>
>> Can you make the type limited?
>
> No, I need to be able to copy them around. But IMHO that shouldn't make a 
> difference in this case, the compiler should be able to figure out that it 
> can construct the objects in place, shouldn't it?

If the type isn't limited, there are cases where you can't build the objects 
in place. And it's likely that the implementation of build-in-place 
functions is different than ones that copy (BiP probably passes in some 
memory and/or a storage pool; regular just returns a temporary created 
inside the function).

It's unlikely that an implementer would want to have two versions of a 
function, so its quite possible that they don't ever build-in-place 
non-limited objects.

(But there is a permission to do so, so you cannot depend on the Adjust 
being called.)

                                  Randy.