From: "Nasser M. Abbasi" <nma@12000.org>
Subject: Re: what to use in place of old gnatbl in newer GNAT ?
Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2012 07:02:13 -0500
Date: 2012-07-05T07:02:13-05:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <jt3vo5$p98$1@speranza.aioe.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: m2mx3ewi2q.fsf@pushface.org
On 7/5/2012 6:41 AM, Simon Wright wrote:
> Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org> writes:
> Actually, aside from the spelling, this is correct; the first number is
> passed by Ada as mode in, so the fact that the Fortran changes it has no
> effect on the value seen by Ada after the call.
>
fyi;
I put the log file of the result of all the Lapack-Ada interface
tests here
http://12000.org/my_notes/ada/ada_lapack_interface_tests.txt
I removed 2 tests from the Makefile which do not build.
The above using GNAT 2012 on linux, with Lapack 77 binding.
Will do full documenations later once I get to look
more into this.
--Nasser
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-05 12:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-05 0:44 what to use in place of old gnatbl in newer GNAT ? Nasser M. Abbasi
2012-07-05 8:38 ` Simon Wright
2012-07-05 10:47 ` Simon Wright
2012-07-05 11:39 ` Nasser M. Abbasi
2012-07-05 11:41 ` Simon Wright
2012-07-05 12:02 ` Nasser M. Abbasi [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox