Re: New limited range type?

["Jean-Pierre Rosen" <rosen@adalog.fr>]

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 700 bytes --]


"Hyman Rosen" <hyrosen@mail.com> a �crit dans le message de news:1068224385.790621@master.nyc.kbcfp.com...
> Martin Dowie wrote:
> > Standard operator precedent rules should apply - I can't see
> > that as being outragous?
>
> But Ada doesn't define operator evaluation order, so this would
> be a major change in the language. (Not a bad one, just big.)
>
Nope.
Ada does not define "evaluation order", but it does define associativity.
A+B-C is definitely (A+B) - C
However, Ada does not define whether (A+B) is evaluated before or after C.

-- 
---------------------------------------------------------
           J-P. Rosen (rosen@adalog.fr)
Visit Adalog's web site at http://www.adalog.fr