Re: fyi, very interesting Ada paper OOP vs. Readability

[NatarovVI <4KCheshireCat@gmail.com>]

>> in the modern parallel world, functional way better than imperative.
>> because data flows in parallel program will be clearer and more
>> deterministic.
> In all fairness, contemporary parallelism frequently needs to handle
> signals, and emit signals, at well defined points in time, and in an
> order dictated by the purpose of the program. The signals are results of
> the program's parallel computations.
> In which ways does monadic IO simplify predictability of effects?

"parallelism is not concurrency"
look at existentialtypes.wordpress.com for terminology explanation.
parallelism is not about predictability. it's only about computational
efficiency of achieving correct result. we can do parallelism without
concurrency.

FP <> Haskell!
i not sayed one word about monads or damned Haskell.
more, personally i do not like Haskell, his "benefits" seems badly 
founded for me. and not only for me.

those buzzy monads... programming with IO no better than imperative. by 
definition. sure it not helps to parallelise and never will.