* Ada 95 X binding with Apex
@ 1997-07-30 0:00 Jeff Creem
1997-07-30 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1997-08-04 0:00 ` Brett Kettering
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Creem @ 1997-07-30 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
Has anyone gotten the intermetrics Ada 95 X bindings to work with Rational
apex 2.2.3A . I've got it working with GNAT but Apex does not like
pragma convention due to RM_95 B.2(21)
This does not appear to be related to the problems of the pragma
appearing too late but a more generic problem with Apex supporting
the pragma.
I've read the section of the LRM and I can't figure out why Apex
does not like it.
Jeff
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Ada 95 X binding with Apex
1997-07-30 0:00 Ada 95 X binding with Apex Jeff Creem
@ 1997-07-30 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1997-08-04 0:00 ` Brett Kettering
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Robert Dewar @ 1997-07-30 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
jeff says, somewhat mysteriously:
<<Has anyone gotten the intermetrics Ada 95 X bindings to work with Rational
apex 2.2.3A . I've got it working with GNAT but Apex does not like
pragma convention due to RM_95 B.2(21)
>>
I guess I have a (pseudo-leather bound) truncated version of the RM, my
section B.2 only has 13 paragraphs.
I can't even guess what para is being referenced here?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Ada 95 X binding with Apex
1997-07-30 0:00 Ada 95 X binding with Apex Jeff Creem
1997-07-30 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
@ 1997-08-04 0:00 ` Brett Kettering
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Brett Kettering @ 1997-08-04 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jeff Creem
Jeff Creem wrote:
> Has anyone gotten the intermetrics Ada 95 X bindings to work with
> Rational
> apex 2.2.3A . I've got it working with GNAT but Apex does not like
> pragma convention due to RM_95 B.2(21)
>
> This does not appear to be related to the problems of the pragma
> appearing too late but a more generic problem with Apex supporting
> the pragma.
>
> I've read the section of the LRM and I can't figure out why Apex
> does not like it.
>
> Jeff
The Apex compiler is not yet complete and pragma convention does not
work for types. I am told that Apex V2.4 will complete the
implementation of pragma convention, but have not yet verified that.
Brett
--
Views and opinions expressed are mine and not those of
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~1997-08-04 0:00 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
1997-07-30 0:00 Ada 95 X binding with Apex Jeff Creem
1997-07-30 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1997-08-04 0:00 ` Brett Kettering
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox