* Greenhills Drops Ada-83 Support?!
@ 1997-05-21 0:00 Rick Flower
1997-05-22 0:00 ` Jeff Creem
1997-05-22 0:00 ` Samuel Mize
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Rick Flower @ 1997-05-21 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
Anyone else heard this from the horses mouth? Sounds pretty pathetic
to me! At this rate, they won't last too long as an Ada vendor!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Greenhills Drops Ada-83 Support?!
1997-05-21 0:00 Greenhills Drops Ada-83 Support?! Rick Flower
1997-05-22 0:00 ` Jeff Creem
@ 1997-05-22 0:00 ` Samuel Mize
1997-05-29 0:00 ` scott
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Samuel Mize @ 1997-05-22 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
In article <wnsozgefto.fsf@ms31.sp.trw.com>,
Rick Flower <flower@ms31.sp.trw.com> wrote:
>
>Anyone else heard this from the horses mouth? Sounds pretty pathetic
>to me! At this rate, they won't last too long as an Ada vendor!
Do they have a big base of existing customers for Ada 83, who would
pay for Ada 83 support? I would expect new customers to want Ada 95.
Sam Mize
--
Samuel Mize -- smize@imagin.net -- Team Ada
(personal net account)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Greenhills Drops Ada-83 Support?!
1997-05-21 0:00 Greenhills Drops Ada-83 Support?! Rick Flower
@ 1997-05-22 0:00 ` Jeff Creem
1997-05-22 0:00 ` Samuel Mize
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Creem @ 1997-05-22 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
In article <wnsozgefto.fsf@ms31.sp.trw.com>, Rick Flower
<flower@ms31.sp.trw.com> wrote:
>Anyone else heard this from the horses mouth? Sounds pretty pathetic
>to me! At this rate, they won't last too long as an Ada vendor!
Well they have Ada 95 support. There are a few things they could
add to improve the backwards compatibility (such as adding back in
some of the now optional float attributes).
How much is it really going to hurt you to have to use an Ada 95 compiler
instead?
Jeff
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Greenhills Drops Ada-83 Support?!
1997-05-22 0:00 ` Samuel Mize
@ 1997-05-29 0:00 ` scott
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: scott @ 1997-05-29 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
In article 1@prime.imagin.net, smize@news.imagin.net (Samuel Mize) writes:
>In article <wnsozgefto.fsf@ms31.sp.trw.com>,
>Rick Flower <flower@ms31.sp.trw.com> wrote:
>>
>>Anyone else heard this from the horses mouth? Sounds pretty pathetic
>>to me! At this rate, they won't last too long as an Ada vendor!
>
>Do they have a big base of existing customers for Ada 83, who would
>pay for Ada 83 support? I would expect new customers to want Ada 95.
Probably is a function of the project-phase the user-base is in.
I know that we'd love to go to Ada95 [and we are using the GH tool
suite] but this, for various reasons, isn't possible due to how
commited we are to the target-OS, Host-platform, etc..
Scott
---
Hughes Aircraft Co./Raytheon/whatever/? voice: (310) 616-1059
Sensors and Communications Systems Segment
PO Box 902, EO/E01/A172, El Segundo, Ca. 90245
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~1997-05-29 0:00 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
1997-05-21 0:00 Greenhills Drops Ada-83 Support?! Rick Flower
1997-05-22 0:00 ` Jeff Creem
1997-05-22 0:00 ` Samuel Mize
1997-05-29 0:00 ` scott
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox