From: jcreem@mailgw.sanders.lockheed.com (Jeff Creem)
Subject: Re: Greenhills Drops Ada-83 Support?!
Date: 1997/05/22
Date: 1997-05-22T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <jcreem-2205971233150001@ljd155.sanders.lockheed.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: wnsozgefto.fsf@ms31.sp.trw.com
In article <wnsozgefto.fsf@ms31.sp.trw.com>, Rick Flower
<flower@ms31.sp.trw.com> wrote:
>Anyone else heard this from the horses mouth? Sounds pretty pathetic
>to me! At this rate, they won't last too long as an Ada vendor!
Well they have Ada 95 support. There are a few things they could
add to improve the backwards compatibility (such as adding back in
some of the now optional float attributes).
How much is it really going to hurt you to have to use an Ada 95 compiler
instead?
Jeff
prev parent reply other threads:[~1997-05-22 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1997-05-21 0:00 Greenhills Drops Ada-83 Support?! Rick Flower
1997-05-22 0:00 ` Samuel Mize
1997-05-29 0:00 ` scott
1997-05-22 0:00 ` Jeff Creem [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox