comp.lang.ada
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeffrey Carter <spam.jrcarter.not@spam.not.acm.org>
Subject: Re: Ada2012 : When to use expression functions rather than function bodies?
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 15:01:08 -0700
Date: 2011-12-16T15:01:08-07:00	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <jcgf35$10t$1@adenine.netfront.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d98a9754-62bb-4f95-bba4-45f498c703bd@z1g2000vbx.googlegroups.com>

On 12/16/2011 05:25 AM, Martin wrote:
> Are there any good arguments for *not* replacing all simple, single
> line functions that don't [directly] access package body state
> information with expression functions?

Are there any good arguments for expression functions?

-- 
Jeff Carter
"I like it when the support group complains that they have
insufficient data on mean time to repair bugs in Ada software."
Robert I. Eachus
91

--- Posted via news://freenews.netfront.net/ - Complaints to news@netfront.net ---



  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-12-16 22:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-12-16 12:25 Ada2012 : When to use expression functions rather than function bodies? Martin
2011-12-16 13:24 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2011-12-17  1:03   ` Randy Brukardt
2011-12-16 18:03 ` Adam Beneschan
2011-12-16 20:36   ` Martin Dowie
2011-12-16 21:34     ` Adam Beneschan
2011-12-16 23:08       ` Adam Beneschan
2011-12-17 12:26   ` georg bauhaus
2011-12-16 22:01 ` Jeffrey Carter [this message]
2011-12-16 22:52   ` Adam Beneschan
2011-12-16 23:09     ` Adam Beneschan
2011-12-17  1:21     ` Randy Brukardt
2011-12-17 12:45       ` georg bauhaus
2011-12-17 13:11         ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2011-12-19 23:34           ` Randy Brukardt
replies disabled

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox