From: Ted Dennison<dennison@telepath.com>
Subject: Re: gprof question
Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2001 13:30:55 GMT
Date: 2001-07-02T13:30:55+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <jI_%6.4357$Kf3.34110@www.newsranger.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 9hpdkf$nhb$1@s1.read.news.oleane.net
In article <9hpdkf$nhb$1@s1.read.news.oleane.net>, Jean-Pierre Rosen says...
>
>I have a multi-tasks, IO intensive program that I ran under gprof to identify bottlenecks (GNAT 3.13p under Win95).
>Although the (real) execution time is about 3mn 30s, gprof shows only 6 samples (at 0.01s. period!).
>My explanation is that interrupts (and therefore gprof sampling) are suspended during IO suspension, and that all time spent in IO
>procedures escapes analysis. Is this correct ? It would be terribly annoying in my case...
I tried at one point to use gprof on WinNT, but was unable to get any useful
results. If you have better luck, I'd love to hear how you did it.
---
T.E.D. homepage - http://www.telepath.com/dennison/Ted/TED.html
home email - mailto:dennison@telepath.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-07-02 13:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-07-02 8:53 gprof question Jean-Pierre Rosen
2001-07-02 13:30 ` Ted Dennison [this message]
2001-07-02 15:03 ` Jean-Pierre Rosen
2001-07-02 17:19 ` Ted Dennison
2001-07-03 7:41 ` Jean-Pierre Rosen
2001-07-03 14:32 ` Ted Dennison
2001-07-02 17:17 ` Larry Kilgallen
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox