From: Jeffrey Carter <spam.jrcarter.not@spam.not.acm.org>
Subject: Re: Constructor for a class with a task defined
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 21:54:23 -0700
Date: 2011-08-31T21:54:23-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <j3n3ao$ll7$1@tornado.tornevall.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b3274dc8-3d7c-4a2e-ac53-7b3629253ac5@p37g2000prp.googlegroups.com>
On 08/31/2011 06:40 PM, Adam Beneschan wrote:
>
> I would think
>
> return new Small_Class'(My_Task => <>);
>
> should work.
That's equivalent to
return new Small_Class'(others => <>);
which is equivalent to
return new Small_Class;
--
Jeff Carter
"You a big nose have it."
Never Give a Sucker an Even Break
107
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-01 4:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-01 0:31 Constructor for a class with a task defined Rego, P.
2011-09-01 1:40 ` Adam Beneschan
2011-09-01 4:54 ` Jeffrey Carter [this message]
2011-09-01 10:13 ` Simon Wright
2011-09-03 15:18 ` Rego, P.
2011-09-03 22:11 ` Robert A Duff
2011-09-05 9:37 ` Georg Bauhaus
2011-09-08 10:22 ` Rego, P.
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox