From: "Randy Brukardt" <randy@rrsoftware.com>
Subject: Re: Ada 0x: Re: Representation clause
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2001 15:12:17 -0600
Date: 2001-02-23T15:12:17-06:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <inAl6.3126$7e6.1290794@homer.alpha.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3a9621eb$1@pull.gecm.com
Martin Dowie wrote in message <3a9621eb$1@pull.gecm.com>...
>Do I spot a possible language extension here?
>
>How about a 'Underlying_Value attribute?
This was discussed ad-nausum during the Ada 9x process and eventually
dropped as having insufficient value. Thus the note in the RM that
someone quoted.
Randy Brukardt.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-02-23 21:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-02-23 2:39 Representation clause Anatoly Chernyshev
2001-02-23 3:59 ` James Rogers
2001-02-23 8:46 ` Ada 0x: " Martin Dowie
2001-02-23 9:01 ` Lutz Donnerhacke
2001-02-23 10:22 ` David C. Hoos, Sr.
2001-02-23 13:56 ` Florian Weimer
2001-02-23 14:57 ` David C. Hoos, Sr.
2001-02-23 21:38 ` Florian Weimer
2001-02-23 21:12 ` Randy Brukardt [this message]
2001-02-24 5:44 ` James Rogers
2001-02-24 10:43 ` Florian Weimer
2001-02-24 17:47 ` James Rogers
2001-02-26 19:51 ` Randy Brukardt
2001-02-26 20:20 ` James Rogers
[not found] ` <WURm6.3437$7e6.1392211@homer.alpha.net>
2001-02-28 2:32 ` James Rogers
2001-02-23 13:25 ` Marc A. Criley
2001-02-23 14:08 ` Des Walker
2001-02-24 13:26 ` David C. Hoos, Sr.
2001-02-24 14:45 ` Ken Garlington
2001-02-25 20:22 ` David C. Hoos, Sr.
2001-02-26 0:53 ` Ken Garlington
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox