From: ichbiah@jdi.tiac.net (Jean D. Ichbiah)
Subject: Re: Why no exception hierarchy ?
Date: 1995/04/05
Date: 1995-04-05T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ichbiah.275.2F832A33@jdi.tiac.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: D6Ky3v.DGn@world.std.com
In article <D6Ky3v.DGn@world.std.com> bobduff@world.std.com (Robert A Duff) writes:
>From: bobduff@world.std.com (Robert A Duff)
>Subject: Re: Why no exception hierarchy ?
>Date: Wed, 5 Apr 1995 20:55:07 GMT
>In article <ichbiah.271.2F82D56D@jdi.tiac.net>,
>Jean D. Ichbiah <ichbiah@jdi.tiac.net> wrote:
>>Since when have you become an adept of the Soviet practice of
>>rewriting history? There is no such thing as Ada 83: it is called
>>Ada. Moreover, look at the cover of the new standard and as
>>far as I can read it refers to a language called Ada 95!
>Jean,
>The title of the ISO standard is "Information Technology -- Programming
>languages -- Ada". No "95" there. A different cover was added to the
>version that was sent out by the Ada 9X office.
This is by a factor of 100 the document that will be available to the
public.
>The Foreword says, "This second edition cancels and replaces the first
>edition (ISO 8652:1987), of which it constitutes a technical revision."
This is the Soviet practice of thinking you can "cancel history"
Jean D. Ichbiah
P.S. How about writing "This new edition cancels the previous version
of Robert Duff of which it constitutes a technical revision". :-)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1995-04-05 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1995-03-23 23:10 Why no exception hierarchy ? Mogens Jensen
1995-03-24 11:19 ` Michel Gauthier
1995-03-24 21:52 ` Tucker Taft
1995-03-25 1:50 ` Kenneth Almquist
1995-03-25 12:40 ` David Weller
1995-03-27 5:47 ` Kenneth Almquist
1995-03-25 16:03 ` Larry Kilgallen, LJK Software
1995-03-27 19:23 ` Kenneth Almquist
1995-03-28 16:56 ` Larry Kilgallen, LJK Software
1995-03-29 0:00 ` Kevin F. Quinn
1995-03-30 0:00 ` Kevin F. Quinn
1995-03-31 0:00 ` Kenneth Almquist
1995-04-04 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1995-04-05 0:00 ` Jean D. Ichbiah
1995-04-05 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
1995-04-05 0:00 ` Jean D. Ichbiah [this message]
1995-04-07 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1995-04-05 0:00 ` Garlington KE
1995-04-06 0:00 ` Versions of Ada (was Why no exception hierarchy ?) Larry Kilgallen
1995-04-07 0:00 ` Garlington KE
1995-04-07 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1995-04-06 0:00 ` Why no exception hierarchy ? Robert Dewar
1995-04-07 0:00 ` Garlington KE
1995-04-07 0:00 ` Jean D. Ichbiah
1995-04-07 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1995-04-07 0:00 ` Norman H. Cohen
1995-04-06 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1995-04-07 0:00 ` Jean D. Ichbiah
1995-04-06 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1995-04-07 0:00 ` Jean D. Ichbiah
1995-04-07 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1995-04-05 0:00 ` Michael Feldman
[not found] ` <1995Apr4.210804.9579@eisner.decus.org>
1995-04-05 0:00 ` Ada means what version by default ? Kevin F. Quinn
1995-04-07 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1995-04-05 0:00 ` Michael Feldman
1995-04-06 0:00 ` Larry Kilgallen
1995-04-07 0:00 ` Jean D. Ichbiah
1995-04-07 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1995-04-05 0:00 ` Is "Ada" 95 or 83? (was: Re: Why no exception hierarchy ?) Theodore Dennison
1995-04-07 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1995-04-07 0:00 ` Ada means what version by default ? Robert I. Eachus
1995-03-25 18:13 ` Why no exception hierarchy ? Robert Dewar
1995-03-28 18:15 ` Jean D. Ichbiah
1995-03-31 0:00 ` Mats Weber
1995-04-04 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1995-04-06 0:00 ` Mats Weber
1995-04-07 0:00 ` Kenneth Almquist
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox