From: Jeffrey Carter <spam.jrcarter.not@spam.not.acm.org>
Subject: Re: Tasks, Entries, and Variables of a Class-wide type
Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2010 11:50:44 -0700
Date: 2010-11-01T11:50:44-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ian2kg$js8$1@tornado.tornevall.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3dcee4c7-9753-41a1-8181-6e7e363bfbe8@t13g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>
On 11/01/2010 08:30 AM, Shark8 wrote:
>
> Crap; you're right!
> While I certainly like the idea of having a task-construct within the
> language itself, I'm still quite new to using them in-practice.
> Thanks for pointing that out.
Interestingly, your original problem does not exist if you use composition
rather than type extension.
--
Jeff Carter
"Why don't you bore a hole in yourself and let the sap run out?"
Horse Feathers
49
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-01 18:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-01 5:40 Tasks, Entries, and Variables of a Class-wide type Shark8
2010-11-01 9:21 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2010-11-01 15:30 ` Shark8
2010-11-01 18:50 ` Jeffrey Carter [this message]
2010-11-01 19:23 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2010-11-01 20:08 ` Georg Bauhaus
2010-11-01 20:56 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2010-11-01 19:28 ` Shark8
2010-11-01 20:49 ` Jeffrey Carter
2010-11-05 12:43 ` Robert A Duff
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox