From: "Jeffrey Creem" <jeff@thecreems.com>
Subject: Re: Booch: iterator invalidation
Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2002 13:26:38 GMT
Date: 2002-11-08T13:26:38+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <iYOy9.16284$Dc4.56479@rwcrnsc51.ops.asp.att.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3dcbb4e4$0$299$bed64819@news.gradwell.net
"Victor Porton" <porton@ex-code.com> wrote in message
news:3dcbb4e4$0$299$bed64819@news.gradwell.net...
> What are conditions when Booch iterators are invalidated?
> It is missing in the documentation.
>
> It also would be great to have the debug version of Booch, checking
> validity of iterators and raising an exception. With GNAT it can be
> done as in C by #ifdef/#endif preprocessor directives (assigning a
Usually no need to resort to #ifdef preprocessor stuff.. Just make a generic
formal
that says error checking enabled. Generic actual parameter is a
constant/static then any decent compiler will optimize out any of the actual
checks in the object code and you get the same effect as the #ifdefs without
the lack of portability.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-11-08 13:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-11-08 12:51 Booch: iterator invalidation Victor Porton
2002-11-08 13:26 ` Jeffrey Creem [this message]
2002-11-08 21:00 ` Randy Brukardt
2002-11-08 18:05 ` Victor Porton
2002-11-09 14:20 ` Simon Wright
2002-11-12 16:50 ` Stephen Leake
2002-11-12 18:28 ` Robert A Duff
2002-11-12 20:09 ` Simon Wright
2002-11-13 14:49 ` Stephen Leake
2002-11-12 17:42 ` Victor Porton
2002-11-12 20:11 ` Stephen Leake
2002-11-13 2:43 ` Victor Porton
2002-11-13 14:56 ` Stephen Leake
2002-11-13 15:40 ` Victor Porton
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox