From: "Steve" <nospam_steved94@comcast.net>
Subject: Re: Ada OOP syntax
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 19:14:25 -0700
Date: 2008-06-17T19:14:25-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <iMWdnRwS1e1p8sXVnZ2dnUVZ_qbinZ2d@comcast.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: g313nr$uih$1@online.de
"Oliver Kellogg" <okellogg@users.sourceforge.net> wrote in message
news:g313nr$uih$1@online.de...
> Steve wrote:
>
>> For a programming language that has so much right, Ada sure has oop
>> syntax
>> wrong. What's more is the syntax is inconsistant with a lot of things
>> that Ada got right and other languages didn't.
>
> Do you know http://mats.weber.org/thesis/Ada-Extensions.pdf ?
>
> Not sure if it's spot on for you but well worth the read, IMHO.
I haven't read the entire document yet, but plan to. It looks very
interesting indeed.
Regards,
Steve
>
> --Oliver
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-06-18 2:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-06-14 13:26 Ada OOP syntax Steve
2008-06-14 15:31 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2008-06-14 18:16 ` Oliver Kellogg
2008-06-18 2:14 ` Steve [this message]
2008-06-18 7:48 ` markus034
2008-06-18 9:58 ` christoph.grein
2008-06-18 12:30 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2008-06-14 19:24 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2008-06-14 21:22 ` anon
2008-06-15 14:32 ` Dirk Heinrichs
2008-06-16 4:59 ` anon
2008-06-16 6:33 ` Dirk Heinrichs
2008-06-17 20:26 ` anon
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox