Re: Getting a symbol table from Gnat 3.15p on Windows

[tmoran@acm.org]

> We did this with a small part of the system once. ...  Every time
> the realtime model changed we were in there editing those packages to
> add/delete variables and recompiling the whole mess.
  If you add a new control or sensor variable to the system under
test, it seems to me you necessarily have to add some information
about it to the monitoring system, no?  A package that simply 'with's
the packages with global variables should be a) automatically buildable,
and b) require nothing but recompilation of that single package
and a relink, when you change the set of variables.  What am I missing?

> The idea here was a minimal impact sort of thing
  A package whose execution happens entirely at elaboration time, and
which never does anything thereafter, seems like a fairly minimal impact,
unless of course you are trying to monitor elaboration itself.