Re: ADA made me hate programming

[anon@att.net]

In <beadd$4c33c62e$433a4efa$30251@API-DIGITAL.COM>, "Marc A. Criley" <mcNOSPAM@mckae.com> writes:
>On 07/06/2010 02:55 PM, anon@att.net wrote:
>> I believe it was also under Bush jr that a story also broke by CNN that
>> Bush's people were thrown for a loop.  CNN know it first and that put
>> egg on a few faces. Bush himself comment on this one.
>
>Either A) you are making this up, or B) reporting hearsay/rumor as fact.
>
>> Also, if you want to know who said that missile were hack then you do
>> the research.
>
>My position is that there is no reputable report stating that missile 
>in-flight updates were hacked. There is no research for me to do.
>
>I can't prove a negative, you simply need to provide one reputable 
>counterexample.
>
>I'll wait...
>
>> Now, I never use Wikipedia for reference, to easy for someone to modify,
>> Because if I check Wikipedia one day the last mod date may change by the
>> next day.
>
>A *reliable* article on Wikipedia will include reference links to 
>establish its credibility. Those references can be independently checked 
>and verified. I've seen no reliable links from you for *any* claim 
>you've made so far.
>
>> As for being "skeptical" I am total skeptical around here of most of this
>> type of posts.
>
>You appear to be severely lacking in skepticism about *your own* claims, 
>since you follow-up a contested, unsupported claim with more unsupported 
>claims.
>
>When I present a factual claim, I either include the reference or have 
>it ready if questioned.  When I espouse an opinion I note it as an 
>opinion, and stand ready to debate it.
>
>My *opinion* is that "anon" is a poser.
>
>> And what I know of the aerospace and NASA would fill volumes.
>
>Your postings, from which a "picture" of your knowledge, experience, and 
>abilities emerges, shows no evidence of this. And based on that 
>"picture", this claim is in fact contraindicated.
>
> > Because you need know who you are talking to.
>
>That's true..."anon".
>
>Marc A. Criley
>http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=marc+a+criley+-information


Since you have not proven, what I have said is false and at the same 
time raise the level to a personal attack you have from your begining 
post on this thread you are
"proclaimed your Defeat."  

Most people will tell you, you can attack the topic or the detail of 
that topic but never attach the messenger because that how to losing 
battle. And after making personal attack people stop listen to the attacker.

Now denying what I said and starting a personal attach you are saying 
that I too close to the actual truth for your comfort and by your 
action you have let the enemy know it.

As for the one web site address you gave comes from the military which 
by design the military is bias to mislead the enemy. Which says the 
military wants the enemy to watch their left hand so they will not see 
that right cross of coming.

My source came from the watchdog of the US gov't aka the press which 
just restated what the press briefing that the gov't made said.  Now, 
the press is the only watchdog that the citizen of the US have to 
insure that the gov't does not become corrupt and harm the citizen 
they represent. And if they lie or misdirect the truth such as CBS's 
Dan Rather did they will find themselves out of a job and may be in 
some case the press company may be fined to the point that they may 
have to close shop.

Then there the people that either visit this newgroup or post.  
The group that post are made up of students, professors, programmers 
both in the public and private sectors, companies that provide 
Ada compilers as well as GCC maintainers.  Then there are the 
curious that would like to ask a question from time to time.  Then 
there is others who just visit and that can include the entire world. 
Some of these people are good and some are bad but everyone should 
treat all people as good one until they make an attack. And then the 
reply is only to defend oneself.

Now Simon Wright and myself have be at odds from time to time for 
around 5 years. I disagree with some things he says and he also 
disagree with me.  Good, people can disagree from time to time and 
that does not make them bad.