From: "J-P. Rosen" <rosen@adalog.fr>
Subject: Re: naming, was Re: Design problem: generic package vs tagged subtype
Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2010 11:49:16 +0200
Date: 2010-07-01T11:49:16+02:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <i0hoas$33p$1@news.eternal-september.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <i0h4kp$7rp$1@speranza.aioe.org>
tmoran@acm.org a �crit :
>> That's one of the things I dislike in Ada - everything (types, variables,
>> packages, operations) follows exactly the same naming convention and doesn't
>> use any special character/whatever to distinguish between them, so you run
>> out of good names in no time...
> You are welcome to invent your own prefixes or suffixes.
... and have your naming rules checked by AdaControl (sorry, couldn't
resist) ;-)
--
---------------------------------------------------------
J-P. Rosen (rosen@adalog.fr)
Visit Adalog's web site at http://www.adalog.fr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-01 9:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-30 17:52 Design problem: generic package vs tagged subtype Marek Janukowicz
2010-06-30 19:23 ` Simon Wright
2010-06-30 22:33 ` Marek Janukowicz
2010-07-01 4:13 ` naming, was " tmoran
2010-07-01 9:49 ` J-P. Rosen [this message]
2010-07-01 15:48 ` Marcelo Coraça de Freitas
2010-07-01 5:57 ` Simon Wright
2010-07-01 18:30 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2010-07-01 19:28 ` Simon Wright
2010-07-01 19:59 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2010-07-01 21:14 ` Per Sandberg
2010-07-02 9:25 ` Stephen Leake
2010-07-02 10:50 ` Georg Bauhaus
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox