From: tmoran@acm.org
Subject: naming, was Re: Design problem: generic package vs tagged subtype
Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2010 04:13:14 +0000 (UTC)
Date: 2010-07-01T04:13:14+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <i0h4kp$7rp$1@speranza.aioe.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: i0ggo1$1ejm$1@adenine.netfront.net
> That's one of the things I dislike in Ada - everything (types, variables,
> packages, operations) follows exactly the same naming convention and doesn't
> use any special character/whatever to distinguish between them, so you run
> out of good names in no time...
You are welcome to invent your own prefixes or suffixes. Words in
English often don't use those but depend on context and syntax to
disambiguate. The fish in the bowl was one of the fish in the stream, but
I decided to go fish in the stream and tell this fish story.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-01 4:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-30 17:52 Design problem: generic package vs tagged subtype Marek Janukowicz
2010-06-30 19:23 ` Simon Wright
2010-06-30 22:33 ` Marek Janukowicz
2010-07-01 4:13 ` tmoran [this message]
2010-07-01 9:49 ` naming, was " J-P. Rosen
2010-07-01 15:48 ` Marcelo Coraça de Freitas
2010-07-01 5:57 ` Simon Wright
2010-07-01 18:30 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2010-07-01 19:28 ` Simon Wright
2010-07-01 19:59 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2010-07-01 21:14 ` Per Sandberg
2010-07-02 9:25 ` Stephen Leake
2010-07-02 10:50 ` Georg Bauhaus
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox