From: BrianG <briang000@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Child vs nested package : efficiency matter
Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2010 21:38:09 -0400
Date: 2010-06-01T21:38:09-04:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <hu4ckk$1ej$1@news.eternal-september.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <op.vdmx6by6xmjfy8@garhos>
Yannick Duchï¿œne (Hibou57) wrote:
> I've just found : pragma Inline is not automatically applied, it
> requires the -gnatn option Brian talked about. I though this was
> automatically done when the -O option is present (I rarely use inline,
> so I was not aware of that).
>
Also note that there's a difference between -gnatn and -gnatN. The
latter is more thorough. It's been a while, but I think -gnatN is
required for multi-unit inlines.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-02 1:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-29 12:56 Child vs nested package : efficiency matter Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57)
2010-05-30 1:17 ` BrianG
2010-06-01 15:03 ` Adam Beneschan
2010-06-01 15:34 ` Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57)
2010-06-01 15:38 ` Adam Beneschan
2010-06-01 19:04 ` Simon Wright
2010-06-01 19:11 ` Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57)
2010-06-02 11:11 ` -gnatN breakage was: " Alex R. Mosteo
2010-06-02 14:39 ` Vadim Godunko
2010-06-02 16:45 ` Georg Bauhaus
2010-06-02 16:50 ` Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57)
2010-06-02 20:35 ` Vadim Godunko
2010-06-01 18:35 ` Adam Beneschan
2010-06-01 19:09 ` Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57)
2010-06-01 19:44 ` Adam Beneschan
2010-06-01 19:56 ` Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57)
2010-06-02 1:38 ` BrianG [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox