From: BrianG <briang000@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: SPARK: What does it prove?
Date: Sat, 29 May 2010 21:06:55 -0400
Date: 2010-05-29T21:06:55-04:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <htsdm4$1lt$2@news.eternal-september.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b7e59174-8a8c-490f-a216-38600ef02a6c@c7g2000vbc.googlegroups.com>
mockturtle wrote:
> On May 29, 4:42 pm, Marco <prenom_no...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> On May 28, 6:55 am, Rod Chapman <roderick.chap...@googlemail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> PS...if the SPARK traffic here really does get annoyingly high,
>>> then perhaps we should create comp.lang.ada.spark?
>> No - I enjoy the SPARK threads even though I am not using it (yet).
>> Traffic volume on this group is light and respectful.
>
> +1 Marco just took the words out of my mouth (err.. keyboard? :-)
> "yet" included...
Ditto, on both counts.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-30 1:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-28 13:25 SPARK: What does it prove? Peter C. Chapin
2010-05-28 13:55 ` Rod Chapman
2010-05-28 15:58 ` Peter C. Chapin
2010-05-29 14:42 ` Marco
2010-05-29 19:02 ` mockturtle
2010-05-30 1:06 ` BrianG [this message]
2010-05-30 13:06 ` Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57)
2010-05-31 1:17 ` Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57)
2010-05-31 1:21 ` Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57)
2010-05-31 13:05 ` Phil Thornley
2010-05-31 23:36 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox