From: "Randy Brukardt" <randy@rrsoftware.com>
Subject: Re: Question about default discriminants and mutable objects.
Date: Thu, 6 May 2010 21:07:06 -0500
Date: 2010-05-06T21:07:06-05:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <hrvskb$p67$1@munin.nbi.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 4be361f3$0$2430$4d3efbfe@news.sover.net
"Peter C. Chapin" <pcc482719@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:4be361f3$0$2430$4d3efbfe@news.sover.net...
> AdaMagica wrote:
>
>> Gene,
>> you guessed quite well. See Ada 83 Rationale
>>
>> http://archive.adaic.com/standards/83rat/html/ratl-04-07.html#4.7
>>
>> and especially 4.7.4.
>
> Thanks... that was interesting. I suppose the next time I find myself
> wondering about the rationale for a design decision in Ada I should maybe
> read the rationale. :)
Remember that there are three of them: one each for Ada 83, Ada 95, and Ada
2005. Depending on the feature, you might need to look at all three. (Not
sure if there will be one for Ada 2012.)
Randy.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-07 2:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-06 0:41 Question about default discriminants and mutable objects Peter C. Chapin
2010-05-06 1:26 ` Randy Brukardt
2010-05-06 4:07 ` Gene
2010-05-06 4:56 ` AdaMagica
2010-05-06 14:59 ` Adam Beneschan
2010-05-07 0:47 ` Peter C. Chapin
2010-05-07 2:07 ` Randy Brukardt [this message]
2010-05-07 12:35 ` Robert A Duff
2010-05-06 15:15 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox