From: "J-P. Rosen" <rosen@adalog.fr>
Subject: Re: confusion with string initialization
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 16:12:48 +0200
Date: 2010-04-19T16:12:48+02:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <hqhod3$tit$1@news.eternal-september.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1004191451020.16262@Bluewhite64.example.net>
Colin Paul Gloster a �crit :
> Why did you consider a book which makes which packages things are in
> unclear by mutiliating programs by means of the USE keyword to be
> excellent?
Because it makes lisibility a lot better by drawing attention of the
reader on what actually the thing does, and getting rid of useless
information that you can find easily by clicking on the identifier and
selecting "go to declaration".
(Ok, Ok, I'm a bit provocative here, but I'm tired of seeing people
jumping on beginners and insisting on a notation that can drive them
away of the language screaming).
--
---------------------------------------------------------
J-P. Rosen (rosen@adalog.fr)
Visit Adalog's web site at http://www.adalog.fr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-19 14:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-17 13:21 confusion with string initialization brett
2010-04-17 13:06 ` Georg Bauhaus
2010-04-17 17:42 `
2010-04-17 19:01 ` J-P. Rosen
2010-04-17 21:30 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2010-04-18 2:13 ` brett
2010-04-18 13:36 ` Alex Mentis
2010-04-19 14:54 ` Colin Paul Gloster
2010-04-19 14:12 ` J-P. Rosen [this message]
2010-04-19 18:20 ` John B. Matthews
2010-04-19 23:18 ` Adam Beneschan
2010-04-20 3:37 ` John B. Matthews
2010-04-27 9:08 ` Jacob Sparre Andersen
2010-04-28 13:26 ` BrianG
2010-04-19 19:48 `
2010-04-19 20:05 ` Warren
2010-04-19 20:06 ` Georg Bauhaus
2010-04-21 1:12 ` brett
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox