Re: Dynamic Variant Record Creation

["Randy Brukardt" <randy@rrsoftware.com>]

"Adam Beneschan" <adam@irvine.com> wrote in message 
news:a4de16f2-1b14-4c9d-886a-2e61f6c01863@k6g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
On Mar 16, 4:39?pm, "Randy Brukardt" <ra...@rrsoftware.com> wrote:
...
>This has to use the same sort of case statement to initialize the
>components in the variant parts.  So I thought that basically the code
>would be using the same logic, plus assigning initial values to the
>non-variant components.

As noted to Bob, that doesn't work in Janus/Ada. There also is a critical 
limitation on our intermediate code: there cannot be case statement-like 
control structures in expressions (we completely separate control flow and 
values in the intermediate code; there cannot be live values when there is 
control flow and vice-versa; values have very limited control flow 
possibilities from short circuit operations and loop initializers).

If the idea offered much additional expressiveness, I wouldn't object, but 
it doesn't seem to have enough.

Steve Baird and I had worked out a partially constrained discriminant 
constraint which would have provided a much better solution to this problem 
along with many others -- but Tucker Taft couldn't seem to wrap his mind 
around the idea (it seemed natural to me) and thus it got quickly killed. 
Thus I don't think there will be any relief.


                                           Randy.

P.S. It probably isn't fair to single out Tucker for killing the idea, but 
since he usually has a much more flexible view of the world, it was bizarre 
that he couldn't understand it. I suspect many took that as an indication 
that it was fatally flawed; I suspect the problem more was one of 
presentation.