From: Brian Drummond <brian_drummond@btconnect.com>
Subject: Re: Why I hate Gtk+/GNOME (from the perspective of an Ada supporter)
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 15:55:45 +0000
Date: 2008-01-24T15:55:45+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <hkbhp317q3cg5f89243pdnkaevc79edrvt@4ax.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 183a03c8-5379-4bfb-b311-f6e014e88719@1g2000hsl.googlegroups.com
On Thu, 24 Jan 2008 03:04:14 -0800 (PST), Ludovic Brenta
<ludovic@ludovic-brenta.org> wrote:
>The one thing I'm wondering is why you guys want to rebuild GTK+ in
>the first place? Are there no suitable prebuilt binaries anywhere so
>you can concentrate on GtkAda?
Speaking as a user who tried GTKada about six months ago...
I had a little time between projects to evaluate Ada for future development; the
language was attractive, GTKada looked attractive for cross-platform GUI
development, and the "testgtk" demo package built easily (on Windows).
(Downloads from libre : Gnat 2007, GTKada for Windows from Gnat 2006.
OS : Win2000 SP4)
BUT... there are so many ways to crash TestGTK (on Windows 2000) just by
pressing buttons. It may be rock solid on Linux but I have my doubts...
Some of the bugs were easy to find and fix at the Ada level, which was actually
reassuring; the demo thus (accidentally, I presume!) illustrated how Ada really
does help to promote reliable programs.
Other bugs however were quickly traced into the C level stuff, which disappered
into the GTK library. These were pretty fundamental bugs ; massive memory leaks
and crashes.
For example, in the "Plot 3D" demo, pressing the "Rotate" buttons had three
unexpected effects on my system; both with the pre-built "Testgtk" executable
and my build.
(1) Some of the buttons disappear : not very serious, probably fixable within
Ada. (not attempted; I'd probably have had to understand the signalling model to
tell the buttons to redraw themselves)
(2) About 300K memory leak for each press of a Rotate button..
(3) The 32nd press exited the program with a PROGRAM ERROR : Exception Access
Violation which the stack trace suggested came from below the GTK interface.
To deal with them any further I would have had to find the GTK 2.8.0 sources,
and learn to build that on Windows.(Unfortunately, other work then intervened,
as it does)
So I concluded, albeit without having got very far into the evaluation:
There are no suitable prebuilt binaries anywhere (I can find at least) so
I could concentrate on GtkAda.
- Brian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-24 15:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-23 8:54 [blog] Why I hate Gtk+/GNOME (from the perspective of an Ada supporter) Martin Krischik
2008-01-23 12:35 ` petter_fryklund
2008-01-23 16:15 ` Martin Krischik
2008-01-23 16:22 ` [blog] " Ludovic Brenta
2008-01-23 16:39 ` Tero Koskinen
2008-01-24 7:40 ` Martin Krischik
2008-01-24 7:44 ` Martin Krischik
2008-01-24 9:13 ` Maxim Reznik
2008-01-24 11:04 ` Ludovic Brenta
2008-01-24 11:50 ` Martin Krischik
2008-01-24 15:55 ` Brian Drummond [this message]
2008-01-24 17:08 ` Martin Krischik
2008-01-24 17:21 ` Pascal Obry
2008-01-25 7:28 ` Martin Krischik
2008-01-25 8:37 ` Ludovic Brenta
2008-01-25 10:45 ` Martin Krischik
2008-01-25 10:56 ` Pascal Obry
2008-01-25 12:17 ` Martin Krischik
2008-01-25 13:09 ` Ludovic Brenta
2008-01-25 15:05 ` Martin Krischik
2008-01-25 15:53 ` Stefan Bellon
2008-01-26 9:53 ` Martin Krischik
2008-01-24 11:52 ` Martin Krischik
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox