From: Niklas Holsti <niklas.holsti@tidorum.invalid>
Subject: Re: Scheduling behaviour issue
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2020 15:38:39 +0300
Date: 2020-04-23T15:38:39+03:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <hgdgigFpaklU1@mid.individual.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <lyblnilbcm.fsf@pushface.org>
On 2020-04-23 13:56, Simon Wright wrote:
> Niklas Holsti <niklas.holsti@tidorum.invalid> writes:
[snip]
>> Under RTEMS ...
> So FreeRTOS behaves in the same way as RTEMS?
Sorry, brain fart, I meant FreeRTOS, which you spoke of. (I had other
correspondence at the same time involving RTEMS, and was confused.) I
don't know, of my own knowledge, how either FreeRTOS or RTEMS behaves on
this issue.
--
Niklas Holsti
Tidorum Ltd
niklas holsti tidorum fi
. @ .
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-23 12:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-22 11:34 Scheduling behaviour issue Simon Wright
2020-04-22 16:16 ` fabien.chouteau
2020-04-22 17:20 ` Simon Wright
2020-04-22 18:05 ` Anh Vo
2020-04-22 18:21 ` Niklas Holsti
2020-04-22 18:03 ` Niklas Holsti
2020-04-22 20:41 ` AdaMagica
2020-04-22 21:58 ` Niklas Holsti
2020-04-23 0:47 ` Jere
2020-04-23 10:56 ` Simon Wright
2020-04-23 12:38 ` Niklas Holsti [this message]
2020-04-23 12:57 ` Niklas Holsti
2020-04-23 11:48 ` Simon Wright
2020-04-23 13:18 ` Niklas Holsti
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox