From: Kilgallen@SpamCop.net (Larry Kilgallen)
Subject: Re: Task execution time (writing a scheduler)
Date: 23 Jun 2003 09:00:44 -0500
Date: 2003-06-23T09:00:44-05:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <heBRk8Z5wsXO@eisner.encompasserve.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: mailman.4.1056375821.8204.comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org
In article <mailman.4.1056375821.8204.comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org>, Lionel.DRAGHI@fr.thalesgroup.com writes:
> There is a general agreement that the only feature missing in Ada to fully
> code flexible schedulers is a way to get task execution time.
In what forum was that general agreement reached ?
After 24 years on the market, VMS has rather extensive hooks for coding
such schedulers, but it took many years to get to that point. There are
many IO-related OS primitive measurements needed to achieve fairness.
I presume you intended that the schedulers be adequate to meet needs
rather than merely being flexible. I can make a scheduler much more
flexible by adding an larger color palatte from which to enhance the
logo it displays on a screen.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-06-23 14:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-06-23 13:44 Task execution time Lionel.DRAGHI
2003-06-23 14:00 ` Larry Kilgallen [this message]
2003-06-23 14:51 ` Martin Dowie
2003-06-23 15:15 ` Martin Dowie
2003-06-24 12:19 ` Marin David Condic
2003-06-24 13:10 ` Martin Dowie
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-06-23 15:02 Task execution time (writing a scheduler) Lionel.DRAGHI
2003-06-23 20:46 ` Larry Kilgallen
2003-06-23 22:50 ` Ole Kristensen
2003-06-23 23:24 ` Larry Kilgallen
2003-06-24 9:54 Lionel.DRAGHI
2003-06-24 13:58 `
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox