From: tjerick@ibm.net
Subject: Re: GNAT for OS/2 (was Re: Simpler Question (was Assigning ...))
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2000 01:52:21 GMT
Date: 2000-11-10T01:52:21+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <hRtiNxkNk5Z9-pn2-jpWdoB1fGetd@aigh168by26ya.ab.hsia.telus.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3A0A1E29.5BA5@li.net
On Thu, 9 Nov 2000 03:46:49, Vincent Marciante <marciant@li.net>
wrote:
> Robert Dewar wrote:
> >
> > No need, you are using a pretty old version of the compiler
> > (3.12)
>
> If glladly use a more recent public GNAT version if there was
> one for OS/2 :) Might ACT make one available when GNAT gets
> fully integrated into GCC 3.0? We OS/2ers are accustomed (and
> greatful) for getting only every other public version ;)
Yes, I'd glady accept a new release of the OS/2 version on GNAT 3.1x.
Please?
Tim Erickson
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-11-10 1:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-11-05 0:00 Assigning to dereferenced null access variable Vincent Marciante
2000-11-07 0:00 ` Simpler Question (was Assigning to dereferenced null access variable) Vincent Marciante
2000-11-07 0:00 ` Jean-Pierre Rosen
2000-11-07 0:00 ` Vincent Marciante
2000-11-08 4:20 ` Robert Dewar
2000-11-08 0:00 ` GNAT for OS/2 (was Re: Simpler Question (was Assigning ...)) Vincent Marciante
2000-11-10 1:52 ` tjerick [this message]
2000-11-08 0:00 ` Simpler Question (was Assigning to dereferenced null access variable) Vincent Marciante
2000-11-09 4:43 ` Robert Dewar
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox