From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de>
Subject: Re: Does GNAT support a thread-free RTS?
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 18:35:09 +0200
Date: 2011-09-13T18:35:09+02:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <h754oaw62iab.9wl6489usw2v$.dlg@40tude.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: wcczki8pml7.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com
On Tue, 13 Sep 2011 10:02:12 -0400, Robert A Duff wrote:
> "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> writes:
>
>> Protected objects are not tagged, ...
>
> Protected types are tagged if they are derived from synchronized interfaces.
Effectively not, for design purpose they should be usable as parent types
to derive from, protected operations has to be primitive.
An inability to push implementations down the hierarchy (which is also the
case for Ada's MI) poses a huge problem for the designer and for the end
users.
--
Regards,
Dmitry A. Kazakov
http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-13 16:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-10 15:19 Does GNAT support a thread-free RTS? Simon Wright
2011-09-11 8:20 ` J-P. Rosen
2011-09-11 9:22 ` John B. Matthews
2011-09-11 9:49 ` anon
2011-09-11 10:29 ` Pascal Obry
2011-09-12 0:33 ` anon
2011-09-12 7:27 ` Simon Wright
2011-09-12 9:26 ` Ludovic Brenta
2011-09-12 9:49 ` Ludovic Brenta
2011-09-13 1:22 ` anon
2011-09-12 13:01 ` Robert A Duff
2011-09-11 10:36 ` Simon Wright
2011-09-12 7:19 ` Ludovic Brenta
2011-09-12 23:22 ` Rugxulo
2011-09-13 7:03 ` Ludovic Brenta
2011-09-13 7:55 ` Ludovic Brenta
2011-09-13 8:30 ` Simon Wright
2011-09-13 9:39 ` Georg Bauhaus
2011-09-13 12:18 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2011-09-13 14:02 ` Robert A Duff
2011-09-13 16:35 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov [this message]
2011-09-13 16:54 ` Georg Bauhaus
2011-09-13 20:35 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2011-09-13 21:22 ` Georg Bauhaus
2011-09-14 7:58 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2011-09-13 10:57 ` Peter C. Chapin
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox