comp.lang.ada
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nicholas Paul Collin Gloucester <Colin_Paul_Gloster@ACM.org>
Subject: Re: "Ada For Software Engineers: Second Edition With Ada 2005" - Anyone read it?
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 11:54:36 +0000 (UTC)
Date: 2009-07-14T11:54:36+00:00	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <h3hrls$iad$1@news.eternal-september.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: uemm555t8i0rjk46epjbj5d564iguojgla@4ax.com

On 2009-07-13, John McCabe <john@nospam.assen.demon.co.uk> wrote:
|---------------------------------------------------------------------|
|"I was considering buying Barnes's "Programming in Ada 2005" to along|
|with my Burns etc "Concurrent blah blah" but I noticed on Amazon that|
|M. Ben-Ari has come up with a second edition of his book.            |
|                                                                     |
|Has anyone read that book and, if so, how does it compare to Barnes? |
|                                                                     |
|[..]                                                                 |
|                                                                     |
|I'd be interested in knowing how M. Ben-Ari's book compares.         |
|                                                                     |
|Any views would be gratefully appreciated."                          |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------|

This is the first I have heard of the 2009 edition of "Ada for
Software Engineers". I have not read any of its editions.

I had read some sections of the gratis version of his "Understanding
Programming Languages" from
HTTP://STWWW.Weizmann.ac.Il/g-cs/benari/books/index.html#upl
which seemed to be fairly good, in which he expressed a preference for
ML followed by Ada 95, though it and a number of books by ML advocates
which I have read completely and the variants of ML (not just the
variants of plain ML, but also JoCaml; G'Caml; Gaml; Caml; Objective
Caml; Chamau; BIGLOO; HimML; CeML; and Gaml) do not convince me that
ML is necessarily better than Ada.

WWW.Springer.com/computer/book/978-1-84882-313-6
does not indicate that there is truly a uniform approach in the 2009
book:
"[..]

Ada for Software Engineers
Ben-Ari, Mordechai
[..]
Ada is the programming language of choice for high integrity software
systems and is used extensively in industries such as transportation
and aerospace. [..]
* Object-oriented programming, concurrency, and embedded and real-time
systems are emphasized.
[..]"

I would suggest getting gratis text from
HTTP://STWWW.Weizmann.ac.Il/g-cs/benari/books/index.html#upl
and if you are pleased with it, then it might be worthwhile buying the
new book.

With best regards,
Colin Paul Gloster



  reply	other threads:[~2009-07-14 11:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-07-13 16:03 "Ada For Software Engineers: Second Edition With Ada 2005" - Anyone read it? John McCabe
2009-07-14 11:54 ` Nicholas Paul Collin Gloucester [this message]
2009-07-14 13:16 ` Per Sandberg
replies disabled

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox