From: Ted Dennison<dennison@telepath.com>
Subject: Re: Operator visibility question
Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2001 21:27:41 GMT
Date: 2001-06-04T21:27:41+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <h3TS6.4236$v4.217363@www.newsranger.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3b1bcc2b_4@news.arrakis.es
In article <3b1bcc2b_4@news.arrakis.es>, Nacho Robledo says...
>
>i don't know which is te problem... I use the clause use with packages with
>come with Ada but with my own packages i do not do it .... .i prefer to do
>it like this...
..
>> > C: constant Boolean := MT."<"(A+2,B);
Not a bad rule. But most folks in that circumstance would still either do a "use
type", or a local function renames. The only time I've ever seen the above was
in the code of a BLISS/C hacker who was using Ada under protest and wanted to
make a point about how horrible it was.
---
T.E.D. homepage - http://www.telepath.com/dennison/Ted/TED.html
home email - mailto:dennison@telepath.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-06-04 21:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-06-03 13:48 Operator visibility question Rod Chapman
2001-06-03 14:19 ` Jeff Creem
2001-06-03 15:47 ` Nacho Robledo
2001-06-03 20:15 ` Robert A Duff
2001-06-04 15:24 ` Rod Chapman
2001-06-04 17:55 ` Nacho Robledo
2001-06-04 21:27 ` Ted Dennison [this message]
2001-06-03 16:34 ` Florian Weimer
2001-06-04 15:52 ` Ted Dennison
2001-06-04 22:12 ` Florian Weimer
2001-06-05 12:24 ` Rod Chapman
2001-06-03 20:13 ` Robert A Duff
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox