From: Ivan Levashew <octagram@bluebottle.com>
Subject: Re: Reactive Systems in Ada?
Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2009 18:51:16 +0700
Date: 2009-04-07T18:51:16+07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <grfeo1$6ua$1@octagram.motzarella.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <y5ECl.5072$Lr6.3721@flpi143.ffdc.sbc.com>
Dimonax wrote:
>
> How does it compare to Reactive Languages such as Esterel
>
Esterel has an option to generate either hardware or software
implementation. It might make sense to make software implementation in
Ada so that one can easily attach Ada handlers.
Esterel has some "parallel" features, but since Esterel targets FSMs,
parallel execution is precisely determined. When an execution forks,
every new thread progress with exactly the same speed as the others,
something that's unthinkable for Ada threads.
--
If you want to get to the top, you have to start at the bottom
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-07 11:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-07 8:25 Reactive Systems in Ada? Dimonax
2009-04-07 8:34 ` Martin
2009-04-07 9:18 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2009-04-07 11:51 ` Ivan Levashew [this message]
2009-04-07 12:04 ` Matteo Bordin
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox