From: Ivan Levashew <octagram@bluebottle.com>
Subject: Re: Ada transformations with MetaScribe?
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 12:33:08 +0600
Date: 2009-03-12T12:33:08+06:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <gpaa9o$t8n$1@octagram.motzarella.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <de60fe6c-38d6-4c57-9939-c80c35636370@y13g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>
Hibou57 (Yannick Duch�ne) wrote:
> I know it, and I've talked about Gema in a thread at comp.lang.ada
> two months ago.
Yes, it was your hint.
> Any way, Gema and MetaScribe seems to be very different things : Gema
> is a preprocessor without any predefined syntax (it requires an
> external set of rules), and �that's all� .
GEMA, Refal (and likely MetaScribe) can all be used for transformations
with different degree of comfort.
--
If you want to get to the top, you have to start at the bottom
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-12 6:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-10 22:13 Ada transformations with MetaScribe? Dimonax
2009-03-10 22:50 ` Ivan Levashew
2009-03-11 19:37 ` Hibou57 (Yannick Duchêne)
2009-03-12 6:33 ` Ivan Levashew [this message]
2009-03-11 9:58 ` Martin
2009-03-11 19:33 ` Hibou57 (Yannick Duchêne)
2009-03-12 22:25 ` Dimonax
2009-03-11 19:41 ` Ira Baxter
2009-03-12 22:28 ` Dimonax
2009-03-13 10:44 ` Hibou57 (Yannick Duchêne)
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox