Re: anonymous access type

["Randy Brukardt" <randy@rrsoftware.com>]

"Robert A Duff" <bobduff@shell01.TheWorld.com> wrote in message 
news:wcctz69z38a.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com...
> christoph.grein@eurocopter.com writes:
...
>> It has been the only one since 1980 and will probably stay so for the
>> next 30 or so years if not some earthquake overturns the ARG.
>
> There is an AI about allowing 'in out' and 'out' parameters on
> functions.  I think it actually has a good chance of being approved some
> time in the next few years.  I am in favor of it, in part because it
> allows one to avoid various kludgery involving anonymous access types.
>
> It's AI05-0134.

You mean AI05-0143-1. People will otherwise be confused.

And I agree about the chances of being approved. We have the opposition down 
to a single issue...

                          Randy.