From: "chris.danx" <spamoff.danx@ntlworld.com>
Subject: Re: C code to Ada
Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2003 21:28:27 +0000
Date: 2003-01-25T21:28:27+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <giDY9.3794$RZ.37344@newsfep4-win.server.ntli.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <mailman.5.1043112025.4961.comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org>
sk wrote:
> Hi yet again,
>
> Since I messed it all up pretty bad, here you go ...
> (feel free to clean it up, thicken it and release it
> back to CLA, hint hint :-)
ok I've gotten to the point where I've tidied it up, added separate
handle types for libraries and code within the library, and added a few
modes that where missing (I am waiting to finish the adainit & adafinal
calls and write an example before I email you sk). Now I'm in the
process of writing nice tidy calls to adainit & adafinal - code that
will be called over and over - and am a bit confused.
Should I use ada.unchecked_conversion (which works in the example) or
system.address_to_access_conversion? (or something else entirely?).
I was going to use an address_to_access_conversion but wouldn't that
give an access to an access to a procedure for the following type?
type Procedure_Access is access procedure;
The package instantiation would be
package X
is new System.Address_To_Access_Conversion (Procedure_Access);
What's the best way to do the conversion so the procedure can be called?
In the meantime I will stick with Unchecked_Conversion, which works
*here* even if it's a bit risky.
Chris
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-01-25 21:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-01-20 18:44 C code to Ada chris.danx
2003-01-20 21:33 ` sk
2003-01-20 21:43 ` chris.danx
2003-01-20 22:56 ` James S. Rogers
2003-01-20 23:05 ` chris.danx
2003-01-21 2:17 ` Jeffrey Carter
2003-01-20 23:32 ` sk
2003-01-21 0:56 ` chris.danx
2003-01-21 1:26 ` sk
2003-01-21 15:49 ` Frank J. Lhota
2003-01-22 1:05 ` chris.danx
2003-01-21 2:27 ` Jeffrey Carter
2003-01-21 2:55 ` sk
2003-01-21 19:33 ` Jeffrey Carter
2003-01-21 6:18 ` Simon Wright
[not found] ` <3E2C6B2B.5090600@noname.com>
2003-01-20 21:39 ` sk
2003-01-21 1:23 ` sk
2003-01-25 21:28 ` chris.danx [this message]
2003-01-26 2:16 ` sk
2003-01-26 3:04 ` sk
[not found] ` <3E33502D.7030503@noname.com>
2003-01-26 5:37 ` sk
2003-01-23 8:00 ` sk
2003-01-24 18:03 ` chris.danx
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox