Re: Licensing, again

[M E Leypold <development-2006-8ecbb5cc8aREMOVETHIS@ANDTHATm-e-leypold.de>]

"Carroll, Andrew" <andrew.carroll@okstate.edu> writes:

> >------------------------------
> >From: "Ludovic Brenta" <ludovic@ludovic-brenta.org>
> >Subject: Licensing, again
> >
> [snip]
> >> > See http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Ada_Programming/Installing
> >
> >Read that page. I really mean it. Have you read that page? Really?
> >
> >Also, see
> >http://www.ada-france.org/debian/debian-ada-policy.html#How-the-Ada->co
> mpiler-for-Etch-was-chosen again, I really mean it when I say "see this
> >page".
> 
> You can keep your little wiki-link.  It took you more characters to type
> the links and all that elementary babble about really reading things
> than it would have to just answer my question.

Well, that is your problem then, man. (Shaking my head). You obviously
don't want an answer. Let me tell you: The Debian policy documents for
choosing the compilers now and in future are exemplary (at least
compared with the usual non documentation of open source stuff goes
:-)). 

And don't expect people to "explain" something to you if you're to
conceited to read some text elsewhere which explains what you want to
know. After all under these circumstance one wouldn't expect you to
read the explanation written in c.l.a, or would you?

Regards -- Markus