From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de>
Subject: Re: Legit Warnings or not
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2011 10:27:30 +0200
Date: 2011-07-30T10:27:30+02:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <gfjkj1eowd8x.1q86rn9zvkfd.dlg@40tude.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: j0viio$3qp$1@munin.nbi.dk
On Fri, 29 Jul 2011 19:17:25 -0500, Randy Brukardt wrote:
> "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> wrote in message
> news:a47trh2rfxvh.fy7nhwxd9kpi$.dlg@40tude.net...
>> On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 18:48:30 -0500, Randy Brukardt wrote:
> ...
>>> Yes, for Ada it is too much. Anything implemented now has to be compatible
>>> with the existing language and implementations.
>>
>> And where is any incompatibility? Why array or record cannot be
>> interfaces?
>
> Interfaces require multiple inheritance. Multiple inheritance is
> unimplementable (at least efficiently). It's completely unimplementable in
> Janus/Ada which is based on fixed, statically sized objects and components.
> (Generic code sharing is a lot easier.)
1. Ada 2005 has interfaces.
2. The case I gave is fully static, without classes (of arrays or records).
This is not a dynamic interface it is just same thing as "type X is
private;" Private and limited private were interfaces already in Ada 83.
3. It was you arguing for objects which size were indeterminable and
components dynamically allocated. And now?
4. Why a built-in implementation of array of S'Class (what you seemed to be
arguing for) should be easier/more efficient/more compatible to Ada than an
implementation trough Ada.Container only publicly visible as an array?
--
Regards,
Dmitry A. Kazakov
http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-30 8:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-20 22:30 Legit Warnings or not Anh Vo
2011-07-20 23:16 ` Robert A Duff
2011-07-21 18:43 ` Anh Vo
2011-07-23 0:26 ` Randy Brukardt
2011-07-23 14:26 ` Robert A Duff
2011-07-21 2:37 ` Jeffrey Carter
2011-07-21 9:50 ` Brian Drummond
2011-07-21 14:39 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2011-07-23 0:36 ` Randy Brukardt
2011-07-23 9:03 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2011-07-23 11:07 ` Simon Wright
2011-07-23 11:21 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2011-07-26 21:25 ` Randy Brukardt
2011-07-27 7:45 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2011-07-28 0:37 ` Randy Brukardt
2011-07-28 9:22 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2011-07-28 14:22 ` Robert A Duff
2011-07-28 14:41 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2011-07-28 15:10 ` Robert A Duff
2011-07-28 17:05 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2011-07-28 23:32 ` Randy Brukardt
2011-07-28 23:48 ` Randy Brukardt
2011-07-29 6:57 ` Simon Wright
2011-07-29 18:56 ` Jeffrey Carter
2011-07-30 0:13 ` Randy Brukardt
2011-07-29 7:41 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2011-07-30 0:17 ` Randy Brukardt
2011-07-30 8:27 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov [this message]
2011-08-01 22:12 ` Randy Brukardt
2011-08-02 10:01 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2011-08-02 21:30 ` Randy Brukardt
2011-08-03 9:01 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2011-08-03 20:35 ` Randy Brukardt
2011-08-04 8:11 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2011-08-05 23:57 ` Randy Brukardt
2011-08-06 8:23 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2011-08-08 21:30 ` Randy Brukardt
2011-07-23 14:32 ` Robert A Duff
2011-07-26 21:32 ` Randy Brukardt
2011-07-21 15:28 ` Adam Beneschan
2011-07-21 15:41 ` Robert A Duff
2011-07-21 20:12 ` Adam Beneschan
2011-07-23 0:31 ` Randy Brukardt
2011-07-21 17:40 ` Jeffrey Carter
2011-07-21 21:30 ` Brian Drummond
2011-07-21 21:54 ` Adam Beneschan
2011-07-22 10:16 ` Brian Drummond
2011-07-22 14:54 ` Adam Beneschan
2011-07-23 0:46 ` Randy Brukardt
2011-07-23 0:42 ` Randy Brukardt
2011-07-23 9:20 ` Niklas Holsti
2011-08-04 5:56 ` David Thompson
2011-07-23 9:24 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2011-07-23 12:36 ` Brian Drummond
2011-07-21 15:13 ` Robert A Duff
2011-07-23 0:52 ` Randy Brukardt
2011-07-23 14:48 ` Robert A Duff
2011-07-21 14:17 ` anon
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox