From: Surfer <surfer@no.spam.net>
Subject: Re: Blocking I/O and Ravenscar
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 05:28:54 +0930
Date: 2007-09-24T05:28:54+09:30 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <gegdf3tbrlmktloegcne8689585hdgc7s8@4ax.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: vp9df3p4o9u55on11ecse9h179d2rv4b2n@4ax.com
On Mon, 24 Sep 2007 03:33:20 +0930, Surfer <surfer@no.spam.net> wrote:
>
>There is a very interesting paper about message passing and Ravenscar
>here:
>
>Communicating Ada Tasks (2003)
>http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/577581.html
>
<snip>
>
>Also a closely related paper here:
>
>Extending Ravenscar with CSP Channels
>http://www.springerlink.com/index/j7h8rr665r0x20n9.pdf
>
Actually while having another look at these papers, I noticed that
"Communicating Ada Tasks" uses three protected objects per channel but
"Extending Ravenscar with CSP Channels" uses only two protected
objects per channel.
That seems to be a considerable improvement.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-09-23 19:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-09-21 21:08 Blocking I/O and Ravenscar Maciej Sobczak
2007-09-22 4:31 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2007-09-22 21:17 ` Maciej Sobczak
2007-09-23 18:03 ` Surfer
2007-09-23 19:58 ` Surfer [this message]
2007-09-23 20:43 ` Maciej Sobczak
2007-09-24 9:03 ` Ole-Hjalmar Kristensen
2007-09-24 13:59 ` Surfer
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox