From: Michael Bode <m.g.bode@web.de>
Subject: Re: Problem with representation clause in gnat 4.3
Date: Sat, 04 Oct 2008 14:36:23 +0200
Date: 2008-10-04T14:36:23+02:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <gc7o0h$min$1@online.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: gc6lib$pq2$1@jacob-sparre.dk
"Randy Brukardt" <randy@rrsoftware.com> writes:
> I can't answer the why (you'd have to ask the GNAT implementers that), but
> the usual fix is to give the size of the record type:
>
> for Compound'Size use 80;
Thanks for answering, but it doesn't work with gnat. But the other tip
to use the alignment clause works.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-04 12:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-03 22:08 Problem with representation clause in gnat 4.3 Michael Bode
2008-10-04 2:36 ` Randy Brukardt
2008-10-04 12:36 ` Michael Bode [this message]
2008-10-04 10:10 ` Per Sandberg
2008-10-04 12:37 ` Michael Bode
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox