From: tmoran@acm.org
Subject: Re: Generic formal access types
Date: Fri, 02 May 2003 16:18:20 GMT
Date: 2003-05-02T16:18:20+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <gTwsa.441952$OV.431849@rwcrnsc54> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3eb23fca$1@epflnews.epfl.ch
>declare
> type Ptr is access Integer;
> package Instance is new Generic_Package (Integer);
> P : Ptr;
>...
>Here, P is of type "Ptr" and the function returns "Node_Content_Ptr".
>For the compiler to accept this, I will have to declare Ptr as "access
>all Integer" and do an explicit conversion:
Why not
declare
package Instance is new Generic_Package (Integer);
subtype Ptr is Instance.Node_Content_Ptr;
P : Ptr;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-05-02 16:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-04-30 18:30 Generic formal access types
2003-04-30 19:27 ` Simon Wright
2003-05-01 8:58 `
2003-04-30 21:42 ` Chad R. Meiners
2003-05-01 9:06 `
2003-05-01 9:58 ` Martin Krischik
2003-05-01 13:00 `
2003-05-02 9:14 ` Ludovic Brenta
2003-05-02 10:43 `
2003-05-02 10:50 `
2003-05-01 10:09 `
2003-05-02 1:14 ` tmoran
2003-05-02 9:52 `
2003-05-02 16:18 ` tmoran [this message]
2003-05-02 16:57 ` Robert A Duff
2003-05-02 19:39 ` Randy Brukardt
2003-05-05 8:14 `
2003-05-05 16:40 ` Matthew Heaney
2003-05-05 17:34 ` Robert A Duff
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox