From: "chris.danx" <spamoff.danx@ntlworld.com>
Subject: Re: The incredibly slimy ethics of Robert Dewar
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2002 12:48:15 +0100
Date: 2002-04-23T12:48:15+01:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <gSbx8.27640$DZ2.4874576@news6-win.server.ntlworld.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 27af1a1d6acaba932a22347a707a1d25.48257@mygate.mailgate.org
This is the biggest load of p*sh ever to be posted cla in my time here. I
will refrain from posting any more replies to any of your posts here until
you demonstrate any signs of maturity; from what I can see, that could be a
very long time indeed.
p.s. Is it smart to slag ppl off (in the manner in which you did) in a
public group to whom you may need to turn at the future for help?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-04-23 11:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-04-23 3:11 The incredibly slimy ethics of Robert Dewar Kent Paul Dolan
2002-04-23 3:43 ` Jim Rogers
2002-04-23 6:02 ` Kent Paul Dolan
2002-04-23 12:33 ` Robert Dewar
2002-04-23 3:51 ` The incredibly slimy ethics of Kent Paul Dolan Larry Kilgallen
2002-04-23 6:05 ` Kent Paul Dolan
2002-04-23 10:21 ` Larry Kilgallen
2002-05-01 12:59 ` Robert Dewar
2002-04-23 3:54 ` The incredibly slimy ethics of Robert Dewar Eric G. Miller
2002-04-23 6:12 ` Kent Paul Dolan
2002-04-23 6:20 ` Kent Paul Dolan
2002-04-23 11:48 ` chris.danx [this message]
2002-04-23 13:08 ` Bobby D. Bryant
2002-04-23 16:36 ` The inscrutable ethics of KPD and RC Wes Groleau
2002-04-27 17:54 ` The incredibly slimy ethics of Robert Dewar Keith Thompson
2002-04-28 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
2002-04-28 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox