From: Kilgallen@SpamCop.net (Larry Kilgallen)
Subject: Re: Ada as a real time language
Date: 28 Aug 2002 11:01:44 -0600
Date: 2002-08-28T11:01:44-06:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <g3zsNulq3VxJ@eisner.encompasserve.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3D6CEB7E.E6930EAD@avionics.saab.se
In article <3D6CEB7E.E6930EAD@avionics.saab.se>, Mikael Lundqvist <mikael.lundqvist@avionics.saab.se> writes:
> I have heard that the Ada Run Time doesn't handle load
> that well. If you have to many tasks or to much input/output
> the Runtime gives in so to speak. In that regard you should
> be better of with a RTOS. I have not any experience myself
> with large Ada programs. Anybody out there who could comment?
There is no such entity as "the Ada Run Time". There may be one
associated with particular Ada implementations, but performance
characteristics are associated with particular implementations
and not with the conceptual notion.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-08-28 17:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-08-28 8:45 Ada as a real time language Marcus Hedlund
2002-08-28 13:05 ` Marin D. Condic
2002-08-28 13:20 ` John McCabe
2002-08-28 13:37 ` Pat Rogers
2002-08-28 15:05 ` John McCabe
2002-08-28 15:25 ` Mikael Lundqvist
2002-08-28 15:44 ` Thierry Lelegard
2002-08-28 15:44 ` Pat Rogers
2002-08-28 15:49 ` Steve O'Neill
2002-08-28 17:01 ` Larry Kilgallen [this message]
2002-08-29 0:47 ` Jerry Petrey
2002-08-28 17:27 ` Ted Dennison
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox