ridiculous question

ridiculous question

[raould]

has anybody ever seen a Lisp syntax front-end for Ada?

Re: ridiculous question

[Ludovic Brenta]

raould writes:
> has anybody ever seen a Lisp syntax front-end for Ada?

You mean something like

(with Ada.Text_IO
  (procedure Hello is
   (Ada.Text_IO.Put_Line ("Hello, World"))))

?

LOL

-- 
Ludovic Brenta.

Re: ridiculous question

[anon]

If you mean Lisp to Ada.  The answer is no.  As for Ada to Lisp, the 
answer is still no. Most Lisp people are having too much fun playing 
with Lisp and trying to improve Lisp to deal with Ada. And Ada people 
are doing their thing with Ada.

There may be a "Interface.LISP" package but I am not sure about that.


In <273ba3a6-142b-4e05-bc12-d576968fa6b6@x19g2000prg.googlegroups.com>, raould <raould@gmail.com> writes:
>has anybody ever seen a Lisp syntax front-end for Ada?

Re: ridiculous question

[Ivan Levashew]

raould пишет:
> has anybody ever seen a Lisp syntax front-end for Ada?

http://www.grammatech.com/products/aa/overview.html

Ada-ASSURED is a powerful tool that ensures consistent coding style, 
prevents syntax errors, and provides productivity features for writing 
and reviewing Ada code. It features language-sensitive editing, 
automatic standards enforcement, high-quality pretty printing, and 
hypertext browsing in a single package. It can be used with any Ada 
compiler.

Ada-ASSURED's open architecture enables you to create custom tools or 
integrate it with existing tools to automate tasks. The power of 
Ada-ASSURED's scripting language comes from its structured internal 
representation of your code. Ada-ASSURED automatically categorizes each 
construct in your file. In contrast, if you use text-oriented tools like 
awk, sed, grep, or perl, you must do the categorization yourself. As a 
result, tasks performed with difficulty using a text-oriented tool are 
often much easier in Ada-ASSURED.

http://www.grammatech.com/aadoc/scripting-language.html

The scripting language of Ada-ASSURED is based on Scheme. Scheme is a 
powerful general-purpose programming language derived from Lisp. 
Although its syntax may be unfamiliar to you, it is easy to master. The 
real benefit of Scheme, however, is not its syntactic simplicity, but 
its semantic power.

-- 
If you want to get to the top, you have to start at the bottom

Re: ridiculous question

[Jean-Pierre Rosen]

anon a �crit :
> If you mean Lisp to Ada.  The answer is no.  As for Ada to Lisp, the 
> answer is still no. Most Lisp people are having too much fun playing 
> with Lisp and trying to improve Lisp to deal with Ada. And Ada people 
> are doing their thing with Ada.
> 
Long time ago, there was an Ada compiler on a Symbolics machine, which 
was a Lisp machine. Long, long time ago...

-- 
---------------------------------------------------------
            J-P. Rosen (rosen@adalog.fr)
Visit Adalog's web site at http://www.adalog.fr

Re: ridiculous question

[Adam Beneschan]

On Jun 24, 4:02 pm, a...@anon.org (anon) wrote:
> If you mean Lisp to Ada.  The answer is no.  As for Ada to Lisp, the
> answer is still no. Most Lisp people are having too much fun playing
> with Lisp and trying to improve Lisp to deal with Ada. And Ada people
> are doing their thing with Ada.

And let's not even *talk* about Forth people...

text_io ada dot_selector with "hello, world" begin put_line text_io
ada dot_selector dot_selector end hello define_procedure

(OK, I don't really know Forth at all---I'm just making this up.)

:-)

                           -- Adam

Re: ridiculous question

[Ludovic Brenta]

Jean-Pierre Rosen wrote:
> Long time ago, there was an Ada compiler on a Symbolics machine, which
> was a Lisp machine. Long, long time ago...

Maybe the OP was referring to a compiler front-end written in Lisp
that would parse Ada sources? Was the Ada compiler you describe like
that?

--
Ludovic Brenta.

Re: ridiculous question

[Ed Falis]

On Wed, 25 Jun 2008 11:27:04 -0400, Ludovic Brenta  
<ludovic@ludovic-brenta.org> wrote:

> Jean-Pierre Rosen wrote:
>> Long time ago, there was an Ada compiler on a Symbolics machine, which
>> was a Lisp machine. Long, long time ago...
>
> Maybe the OP was referring to a compiler front-end written in Lisp
> that would parse Ada sources? Was the Ada compiler you describe like
> that?

The prototype Ada compiler I worked on at Stanford had its front-end  
written in MacLisp.  It was a very effective vehicle for working with the  
abstract syntax tree.

Re: ridiculous question

[Jean-Pierre Rosen]

Ludovic Brenta a �crit :
> Jean-Pierre Rosen wrote:
>> Long time ago, there was an Ada compiler on a Symbolics machine, which
>> was a Lisp machine. Long, long time ago...
> 
> Maybe the OP was referring to a compiler front-end written in Lisp
> that would parse Ada sources? Was the Ada compiler you describe like
> that?
> 
Honestly, I don't know. I must have thrown all documentations about this 
  compiler ten years ago, on grounds of total obsolescence...
-- 
---------------------------------------------------------
            J-P. Rosen (rosen@adalog.fr)
Visit Adalog's web site at http://www.adalog.fr

Re: ridiculous question

[anon]

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1091 bytes --]

For an Symbolics Lisp Machine emulator try:

   http://www.unlambda.com/

follow the link for "Symbolics Lisp Machines and emulation"

And if you email the "Brad Parker" (check mailing list for address) he 
may be able to help in finding the software!  The problem is that it 
will be in the Symbolics Lisp, so you may need to convert to current 
LISP that you wish to use.




In <0kav3g.rgp.ln@hunter.axlog.fr>, Jean-Pierre Rosen <rosen@adalog.fr> writes:
>Ludovic Brenta a �crit :
>> Jean-Pierre Rosen wrote:
>>> Long time ago, there was an Ada compiler on a Symbolics machine, which
>>> was a Lisp machine. Long, long time ago...
>> 
>> Maybe the OP was referring to a compiler front-end written in Lisp
>> that would parse Ada sources? Was the Ada compiler you describe like
>> that?
>> 
>Honestly, I don't know. I must have thrown all documentations about this 
>  compiler ten years ago, on grounds of total obsolescence...
>-- 
>---------------------------------------------------------
>            J-P. Rosen (rosen@adalog.fr)
>Visit Adalog's web site at http://www.adalog.fr

Re: ridiculous question

[Colin Paul Gloster]

"Raould" <raould@gmail.com> wrote in message 
news:273ba3a6-142b-4e05-bc12-d576968fa6b6@x19g2000prg.googlegroups.com :
|--------------------------------------------------------|
|"has anybody ever seen a Lisp syntax front-end for Ada?"|
|--------------------------------------------------------|

This reminded me of such tales on Team-Ada...
Phil Johnson's
"Re: Decline of Ada popularity (was Re: Proposal : For-Loop...)"
timestamped Mon, 27 Aug 2001 10:22:18 -0500 on
HTTP://ListServ.ACM.org/scripts/wa.exe?A2=ind0108&L=TEAM-ADA&P=R3285
and
Wesley Groleau's
"Re: compiling LISP with an Ada compiler." timestamped Mon, 27 Aug 2001 
11:17:00 -0500 on
HTTP://ListServ.ACM.org/scripts/wa.exe?A2=ind0108&L=TEAM-ADA&T=0&O=A&P=9051

Regards,
Colin Paul Gloster

P.S. To those who knew and cared about my unemployment: thank you for
your sympathy. I have recently been awarded a grant. I have not yet had time
to personally inform you. As for those of you who knew and were abusive to
me: shame on you.