From: Sebastian Hanigk <hanigk@in.tum.de>
Subject: Re: run tasks on events
Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 12:35:10 +0200
Date: 2008-05-29T12:35:10+02:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <g1m0su$cst$2@news.lrz-muenchen.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 071c2e77-e37e-4d8d-91e8-533090ace9de@x35g2000hsb.googlegroups.com
"jimmaureenrogers@worldnet.att.net" <jimmaureenrogers@worldnet.att.net>
writes:
> You can create a task which suspends until the ascent/descent phase.
> Simply have the task suspend on an accept statement. The task will
> complete its execution upon execution of a rendezvous associated with
> the accept statement. Alternately, the task can start out executing
> and be suspended upon a call to a blocked protected entry.
Thanks for the pointers! Albeit - as stated in my sibling response - it
lacks the elegance of HAL/S' signal-dependent scheduling.
Sebastian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-29 10:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-28 19:14 [Ravenscar] run tasks on events Sebastian Hanigk
2008-05-28 23:47 ` jimmaureenrogers
2008-05-29 10:35 ` Sebastian Hanigk [this message]
2008-05-29 3:16 ` ahab
2008-05-29 10:31 ` Sebastian Hanigk
2008-05-29 18:56 ` Anh Vo
2008-05-30 6:56 ` Sebastian Hanigk
2008-05-30 7:26 ` [Ravenscar] " Niklas Holsti
2008-05-30 8:57 ` Sebastian Hanigk
2008-05-30 10:47 ` Niklas Holsti
2008-05-30 11:17 ` Sebastian Hanigk
2008-05-30 15:24 ` Alex R. Mosteo
2008-05-30 15:35 ` Ed Falis
2008-05-30 18:02 ` Sebastian Hanigk
2008-05-30 18:11 ` Ed Falis
2008-05-30 11:59 ` stefan-lucks
2008-05-30 12:17 ` jimmaureenrogers
2008-05-30 18:59 ` Sebastian Hanigk
2008-06-02 10:32 ` Alex R. Mosteo
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox