* Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ada Information Clearinghouse
@ 2006-02-27 7:27 Martin Krischik
2006-02-27 10:47 ` Jeffrey Creem
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Martin Krischik @ 2006-02-27 7:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
Hello
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Ada_Information_Clearinghouse
Should we defend the entry? If so we need a reason why the "Ada
Information Clearinghouse" site is "notable"
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:WEB).
Martin
PS: I am not talkin about everybody here putting up a '''keep''' entry.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ada Information Clearinghouse
2006-02-27 7:27 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ada Information Clearinghouse Martin Krischik
@ 2006-02-27 10:47 ` Jeffrey Creem
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jeffrey Creem @ 2006-02-27 10:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
Martin Krischik wrote:
> Hello
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Ada_Information_Clearinghouse
>
> Should we defend the entry? If so we need a reason why the "Ada
> Information Clearinghouse" site is "notable"
> (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:WEB).
>
> Martin
>
> PS: I am not talkin about everybody here putting up a '''keep''' entry.
>
I agree with the deletion. While the AdaIC is useful, it really is not
important enough to have its owk wikipedia entry.
It probably should/could be linked from the wikipedia Ada entry.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-02-27 10:47 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-02-27 7:27 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ada Information Clearinghouse Martin Krischik
2006-02-27 10:47 ` Jeffrey Creem
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox