From: Jeffrey Creem <jeff@thecreems.com>
Subject: Re: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ada Information Clearinghouse
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 05:47:25 -0500
Date: 2006-02-27T05:47:25-05:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ft1bd3-u49.ln1@newserver.thecreems.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1141025263.921588.5390@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>
Martin Krischik wrote:
> Hello
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Ada_Information_Clearinghouse
>
> Should we defend the entry? If so we need a reason why the "Ada
> Information Clearinghouse" site is "notable"
> (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:WEB).
>
> Martin
>
> PS: I am not talkin about everybody here putting up a '''keep''' entry.
>
I agree with the deletion. While the AdaIC is useful, it really is not
important enough to have its owk wikipedia entry.
It probably should/could be linked from the wikipedia Ada entry.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-02-27 10:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-02-27 7:27 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ada Information Clearinghouse Martin Krischik
2006-02-27 10:47 ` Jeffrey Creem [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox