Re: Creating and using Ada packages: need refinement

[Ivan Levashew <octagram@bluebottle.com>]

Ludovic Brenta О©╫О©╫О©╫О©╫О©╫:
>> Adaproject seems to be unmaintained.
> 
> What is adaproject?
http://sourceforge.net/projects/adaprojet/

> deficiencies and lack of portability of C and C++. We use Ada. We
> don't need no stupid autotools. In simple cases, one GNAT project file
> is sufficient. Nowadays, with gprmake, they can even handle multi-
> language projects, so even these are "simple cases".
BTW, is gprbuild publicly available?

http://libre.adacore.com/viewvc/trunk/gps/distrib/features?revision=122527&view=markup
 > NF-43-H216-003 gprbuild no longer packaged with GPS (2008-02-19)
It sounds like one might discover older gprbuild version in some gps 
revision if search carefully. I didn't find it yet.

> Mac OS X is much more standard than e.g. Microsoft Windows, and there
> are people who care about it. They are on http://www.macada.org
I didn't noticed they are using Ada in an advanced way.
Provided that:

http://news.gmane.org/find-root.php?message_id=1204835208.47d0538897a5c%40mail.bluebottle.com&type=blog

...it seems that I was the first one who used FSF GCC to compile Ada and 
Apple GCC to compile C & link everything. Advanced Mac OS X features are 
not accessible from FSF GCC.

-- 
If you want to get to the top, you have to start at the bottom