From: rc211v <rc211v@wanadoo.fr>
Subject: Re: Ariane5 FAQ, Professional version, first draft
Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2003 22:16:45 +0200
Date: 2003-08-05T20:16:45+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fo20jv8ub42ajffdceto06hd767627g4li@4ax.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: e2e5731a.0308041817.4db1a928@posting.google.com
>Therefore I think that we should simply ignore a possibility of conspiracy here.
You are surely right on this,
i understand human errors in a process or mistakes in a design (like
meters/miles confusion) etc, but here it's more difficult to accept.
imagine a car maker designing a new car with an old engine but with a
different gearbox without testing? And nobody in the engineering staff
says uh oh ...
This "bug" is so extraordinary that it deserves a FAQ...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-08-05 20:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-08-03 1:32 Ariane5 FAQ, Professional version, first draft Alexandre E. Kopilovitch
2003-08-04 20:08 ` rc211v
2003-08-05 2:17 ` Alexander Kopilovitch
2003-08-05 20:16 ` rc211v [this message]
2003-08-06 5:46 ` Robert I. Eachus
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox