From: dirk@cs.kuleuven.ac.be (Dirk Craeynest)
Subject: Re: Is it Ada 2005 or Ada 2007?
Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2007 12:07:43 +0000 (UTC)
Date: 2007-11-04T12:07:43+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fgkcmf$5q5$1@ikaria.belnet.be> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 1193872753.943387.212600@e34g2000pro.googlegroups.com
Jerry <lanceboyle@qwest.net> wrote:
>On Oct 30, 3:16 pm, Jerry <lancebo...@qwest.net> wrote:
>> I have seen the "new" Ada referred to as both Ada 2005 and Ada 2007.
[...]
>> Is there an official designation or
>> are left to our own devices to call it what we want?
>
>Thanks for your comments. On balance, things seem as confused as I had
>feared.
This issue is very clear, but some postings here seem to be confused.
The internationally accepted recommendation to refer to the latest
Ada language definition is to use the informal name "Ada 2005".
See <http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.ada/msg/f1cf1036a71fca56>
Dirk Craeynest, Dirk.Craeynest@cs.kuleuven.be
ISO/IEC JTC1/SC22/WG9, Head of Delegation, Belgium
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-04 12:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-30 22:16 Is it Ada 2005 or Ada 2007? Jerry
2007-10-30 23:49 ` Ludovic Brenta
2007-10-31 11:33 ` Stephen Leake
2007-10-31 12:02 ` Ludovic Brenta
2007-11-01 11:16 ` Stephen Leake
2007-11-01 22:34 ` Adam Beneschan
2007-11-11 0:51 ` Brian Gaffney
2007-10-31 0:05 ` anon
2007-10-31 15:38 ` Georg Bauhaus
2007-11-01 9:26 ` Jerry
2007-11-04 12:07 ` Dirk Craeynest [this message]
2007-11-04 12:32 ` Markus E L
2007-11-04 21:55 ` Jerry
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox