comp.lang.ada
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: rolf.ebert_spam_@gmx.de (Rolf Ebert)
Subject: Re: IEC 61508  and Ada
Date: 4 Nov 2003 04:14:27 -0800
Date: 2003-11-04T04:14:27-08:00	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ff940e33.0311040414.138703ab@posting.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: bo5hju$lpb$1@stubsi.arcor-online.net

Alfred Hilscher <ilkbsvvj@expires-2003-11-30.arcornews.de> wrote in message news:<bo5hju$lpb$1@stubsi.arcor-online.net>...
> I've heard that IEC61508 recommends the use of Ada for savety critical 
> software. Now I found, that IEC61508 consists of seven parts. Can someone 
> tell me, which part belongs to software, and which part mentions Ada?

I have a paper copy of some parts in German, and electronic versions
of the other parts in English/French.

As far as I can see, only part 7 (Overview of techniques and measures)
mentions Ada in the non-normative annex C.

C.4 Development tools and programming languages
C.4.1 Strongly typed programming languages

NOTE This technique/measure is referenced in table A.3 of IEC 61508-3.

Aim: Reduce the probability of faults by using a language which
permits a high level of checking by the compiler.

Description:
...
Typical examples of strongly typed languages are Pascal, Ada and
Modula 2.

-----------
All safety integrity levels in table A.3 of part 3 (Anforderungen an
Software "software requirements") are marked "++" for strongly typed
languages. "++" meaning "highly recommended" (besonders empfohlen).

     Rolf



      reply	other threads:[~2003-11-04 12:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-11-03 12:27 IEC 61508 and Ada Alfred Hilscher
2003-11-04 12:14 ` Rolf Ebert [this message]
replies disabled

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox